Love's Labors Lost: How to do it wrong

September 9, 2010

How to do it wrong

I normally enjoy Racialicious, I really do, but this time they dropped the ball. Rather than spell out exactly what's fucked up about it (because it's been said enough times by me and other people), I'll leave it to you, dear reader, to use your native intelligence to discern what is amiss.

Read this (including the comments) and this (including the comments).

And go here if you're still can't put your finger on it.

11 comments:

Alliyah Gallows9/09/2010 9:48 PM
What is with the fangirling of the Wise? *blink*
ReplyDelete
Replies
Alliyah Gallows9/09/2010 10:05 PM
And that LJ thread was busy.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Witchsistah9/09/2010 11:13 PM
I love how dude stays saying that he constantly refers Whites to the work of PoC. I've seen a few of his speeches and at most he tells them that what he's saying is what PoC have BEEN telling them for a long time. He doesn't refer to specific, LIVING, PoC authors who write about this, specific, LIVING PoC thinkers or specific, WORKING PoC organizations attacking these issues. Perhaps he's done that in other talks, articles, books, interviews, but not the ones I've seen.

I keep tellin' you, fuck with WP's money and/or privilege and watch their claws come out.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Witchsistah9/09/2010 11:22 PM
And the PoC basically telling criticizing/critiquing PoC to "shut up" about Wise because "OMG, guyz, WE NEEEEEED HIM!!!" reminds me of BW on interracial sites who try and shut down the critiquing of WM's behaviors on those sites because "OMG, guyz, YOU'LL SCARE THEM OFF!!!" That's what Tim Wise's PoC protectors are afraid of, that if we don't give him enough pats on the head, cookies and Good Whitey awards (as well as more speaking gigs with hefty enough fees and money for his books and articles), he'll just take his bat and ball and go home. They NEVER seem to question that if THAT is what'll make him abandon his so-called heart-felt anti-racism, it wasn't much a committment (other than to his ego and bank account) in the first place.
ReplyDelete
Replies
RVCBard9/09/2010 11:52 PM
@Witchsistah:

Word.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous9/10/2010 2:33 PM
I can't really add anything except Word #2.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Alliyah Gallows9/11/2010 1:32 AM
Witchsistah...

Word #3.
ReplyDelete
Replies
RVCBard9/11/2010 2:31 AM
The fact that we don't even have to say much is a damn shame.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Witchsistah9/12/2010 3:30 PM
We don't even have to SAY anything. Just keep the accolades from them. That'll be enough for them to pout-stomp their way to a teabagger meeting.
ReplyDelete
Replies
RVCBard9/12/2010 7:20 PM
@Witchsistah:

LOL!
ReplyDelete
Replies
RVCBard9/12/2010 10:30 PM
Oh, gee, look. More "unfounded criticism" of Tim Wise and White anti-racist activists!

That was sarcasm.
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Words, Words, Words

. . . a lot of it [fostering rather than smothering students' playwriting] has to do with finding a way to construct a dialogue about ongoing work that empowers the writer. A lot of it has to do with making sure there's a diversity of voices around you. A lot of it has to do with thinking of the writing program as a brain trust for writers, not as some infantilization in which the dramaturg gets the power. And basically trying to find a place where everyone's aesthetic in the room grows larger rather than smaller. There are many ways to do that. It's really not a hard thing to do.
--Paula Vogel, interview with Ann Linden in The Playwright's Muse

Here is what seems to me an elementary truth that must precede any other: namely, that the theater, an independent and autonomous art, must, in order to revive or simply to live, realize what differentiates it from text, pure speech, literature, and all other fixed and written means.
--Antonin Artaud, letter, 9/15/1931

I can take any empty space and call it a bare stage. A man walks across this empty space whilst someone else is watching him, and this is all I need for an act of theatre to be engaged.
--Peter Brook, The Empty Space

My work is characterized by one thing above all --- invention. In theatre we imagine the world, we do not record it, we are not documentary makers. I hold all social realism and journalistic theatre in contempt. It is a sordid habit. And the social realists have the impertinence to pretend they are 'telling the truth…'
--Howard Barker, interview

Women and writers of color are still seen as threats because, in essence, when a woman or writer of color is defining a play world, there's another definition of what our society is, and that's very threatening.
--Paula Vogel, interview with Ann Linden in The Playwright's Muse

Through this experience [working on " . . . and last week it was a mountain"] I learned the importance of the life and the dynamics under the words, and began to see the power of working from the silent space within - the emotions, the images, the experience and the feelings - rather than relying on the words.
--Sande Shurin, Transformational Acting: A Step Beyond

How does it happen that . . . the Occidental theater does not see theater under any other aspect than as a theater of dialogue?
--Antonin Artaud, Theater and Its Double

All conventions are imaginable, but they depend on the absence of rigid forms.
--Peter Brook, The Open Door

I never 'say' anything in my work. I invent a world. Let others decide what is being 'said'. Nor do I claim to tell the truth or enlighten people. We are suffocated by writers who want to enlighten us with their truths. For me, the theatre is beautiful because it is a secret, and secrets seduce us, we all want to share secrets. That is also its politics, if it has any politics at all. And modern democracies hate secrets, they want everything transparent. Obviously the critics collaborate in this desire to expose everything to the light of day, they are the police force, after all.
--Howard Barker, interview

I think that form is content . . . I've always been more interested . . . in the formal devices and the structure rather than in the subject matter . . . I really am a follower of Viktor Shklovsky, who said that in some ways the subject matter doesn't even matter. It's whether or not we see the subject matter anew that matters.
--Paula Vogel, interview with Ann Linden in The Playwright's Muse

I am well aware that the language of gestures and postures, dance and music, is less capable of analyzing a character, revealing a man's thoughts, or elucidating states of consciousness clearly and precisely, than is verbal language, but who ever said the theater was created to analyze a character, to resolve conflicts of love and duty, to wrestle with all the problems of a typical and psychological nature that monopolize our contemporary stage?
--Antonin Artaud, Theater and Its Double

The mediocre artist prefers not to take risks, which is why he is conventional.
--Peter Brook, The Open Door

"Transcendence became my life theme. I wanted to be lifted beyond everyday circumstances and everyday reality."
--Sande Shurin, Transformational Acting: A Step Beyond

I actually think of writing for the stage as not writing . . . It's about structuring, about gaps between the language that are really filled in by the collaborators and the process. It's all about indirection rather than a direct statement . . . It's like a three-dimensional chess game in a way. If I say this, will the director go in this direction? If I say this, will the actor respond? And one of the delights of the process is actually not having your intention fulfilled, but finding out at times that other people's interpretation or intention is actually more interesting than you originally thought of.
--Paula Vogel, interview with Ann Linden in The Playwright's Muse

The person who has an idea of what this language is will be able to understand us. We write only for him. --Antonin Artaud, letter, 9/28/1932